Stephen Pollard has a 2,000 word article on Tony Blair in the Daily Mail today www.dailymail.co.uk entitled 'Morally bankrupt, impotent, he is now doomed'.
Yet not once in his piece does Pollard mention the word 'Iraq'- and the lies the Prime Minister told to gain public- and parliamentary support for the illegal invasion.
How is it possible for anyone penning a piece on the Prime Minister's failings to forget to mention this obvious example of his moral bankruptcy? Could it have something to do with the fact that the author of the piece shared the Prime Minister's enthusiasm for a military intervention?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment