Saturday, December 30, 2006

The Empire Strikes Back, (with blood of course)

Saddam Hussein, the former President of Iraq was hanged today at 3am GMT. The news comes as no surprise, as Saddam's execution was inevitable from the day he was captured, three years ago. He simply knew far too much to be allowed to live. But even more importantly from the point of view of The Empire, Saddam's death- and that of Slobodan Milosevic earlier this year, is intended as a warning. The message could not be clearer: stand in the way of our plans for global hegemony, and you till will either die at the end of a rope or from an induced heart attack in your prison cell. The message is intended for all those who obstruct the neo-conservative project, particularly, the current leadership of Iran and Syria, but also other 'troublesome' leaders who don't toe the line, such as Hugo Chavez in Venezuela and Alexsander Lukashenko in Belarus.
In acting in this way, the U.S .Empire is no different to any others. Throughout history, empire builders, be they Roman, British, Spanish, Ottoman, Russian or German, have shown little mercy to those who had the temerity to stand up to them. The only surprise is that there are those who think Pax Americana is any different.

UPDATE:
Meanwhile, on the day that their former leader was executed, here's news of a poll in Iraq which says that 90% of the country's population believe that life was better before the invasion- i.e under Saddam. No wonder they were so desperate to hang him.

6 comments:

RobBBB said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Neil Clark said...

Great to hear from you Gojira, and a very Happy new year.
Saddam was not on trial for his worst crimes- as the West was heavily complicit in them. He was only on trial because he stopped doing the US's bidding. Don't you think there's something deeply immoral about egging a dictator on to attack his neighbours and supplying him with the weaponry to do so, and then, a few years later, acting all high and mighty and putting him on trial for war crimes? Especially when those who engineered his execution are responsible for outrageous war crimes themselves?
My support for the death penalty is limited to cases in which the defendant has been given a free and fair trial. Very few people would argue that Saddam received that.

RobBBB said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
RobBBB said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Neil Clark said...

If 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' doctrine 'underscores' my entire political philosophy gojira, how come I've never written a single word in support of the regimes in North Korea and Zimbabwe?

RobBBB said...
This comment has been removed by the author.