I've been trawling the websites of the 'muscular' liberal interventionists and it seems none of them are calling for US/British intervention to stop Israel's annihilation of Lebanon- a military attack which has left over 400 people killed and 500,000 displaced.
How can this be so? Is 'non-interference' now the official line of the enthusiastic interventionists?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
They're only interesting in intervening when the country involved is not a free market ally of Uncle Sam. If Cuba had a couple of its soldiers taken hostage by, say, Jamaica and responded in the way Israel has- you can bet your last cent the Euston gang would be screaming for airstrikes on Havana!
Post a Comment