tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post113035199665463212..comments2023-11-05T22:35:31.766+00:00Comments on Neil Clark: Stephen Pollard: the very undemocratic democratNeil Clarkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10479041156190090119noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-1130801052052920032005-10-31T23:24:00.000+00:002005-10-31T23:24:00.000+00:00If you were the real Michael Mansfield and were wi...If you were the real Michael Mansfield and were willing to act for me for a very reasonable rate, I would definitely sue! <BR/>Shorn of his wealth, Pollard would then have to do the only decent thing- go out and enlist for active service in Iraq.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-1130537972144389812005-10-28T23:19:00.000+01:002005-10-28T23:19:00.000+01:00Haha.Good point!If the case wasn't entirely hopele...Haha.<BR/><BR/>Good point!<BR/><BR/>If the case wasn't entirely hopeless in the first place that would be the end.<BR/><BR/>Cummon you pussy! You said you would sue him if he put it in print - he has done so - so sue him!!!<BR/><BR/>What are you waiting for?<BR/><BR/>Where is your honour!<BR/><BR/>SUE SUE SUE!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-1130456027661732262005-10-28T00:33:00.000+01:002005-10-28T00:33:00.000+01:00"You replied in a very rude and dismissive way- ca...<I>"You replied in a very rude and dismissive way- calling my husband an 'apologist for mass murder'- which he most certainly is not. If you were to repeat that allegation in print, please be in no doubt that my husband would initiate libel proceedings against you."</I><BR/><BR/>If the allegation is so libellous, then why have <I>you</I> chosen to publish it? Pollard never published it - he sent it to you an e-mail not intended for anyone else to see.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-1130405822759146842005-10-27T10:37:00.000+01:002005-10-27T10:37:00.000+01:00It is a pity that Stephen Pollard cannot bring him...It is a pity that Stephen Pollard cannot bring himself to have an original thought. All he seems to be capable of is towing the Government line on the disaster that is Iraq. Indeed the situation is so terrible, for the occupier as well as the occupied, that an 82 year old man was ejected from the Labour Party Conference. His crime? He dared to say that the fairy tale Jack Straw was spinning about the success (read catastrophe) that is Kosovo, was nonsense. So much for free speech!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-1130372007691789062005-10-27T01:13:00.000+01:002005-10-27T01:13:00.000+01:00Well, this court case is going to fun now that Pol...Well, this court case is going to fun now that Pollard has put this "apologist for mass-murder" thing in print, and done so repeatedly.<BR/><BR/>I for one can't wait.<BR/><BR/>Pollard is one of those "rich arrogant neo-con zoinist capitalist pigs" so he will hire one of those crafty "rich arrogant neo-con zoinist capitalist pig" lawyers to defend himself - and win, and our poor hack here will be out on his arse.<BR/><BR/>hahahaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-1130371649537208252005-10-27T01:07:00.000+01:002005-10-27T01:07:00.000+01:00It is at best a very weak point. I mean so what i...It is at best a very weak point. I mean so what if Pollard is hypocritical on this issue - who the hell cares, he is a journo for chrisake! If this crazy hack thinks that he has got some kind of zinger with this he is quite demented.<BR/><BR/>Anyway you cannot compare pre-conflict estimates to estimates made after. The first COULD be due to errors but those after+during are less likely to be.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-1130371057597291122005-10-27T00:57:00.000+01:002005-10-27T00:57:00.000+01:00Oh, and do you not feel a wee bit embarassed to ef...Oh, and do you not feel a wee bit embarassed to effectivly admit to using your wife's email to continue a debate with someone who views you with such contempt?<BR/><BR/>Seriously!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-1130370846716044362005-10-27T00:54:00.000+01:002005-10-27T00:54:00.000+01:00Dude, are you proud of the fact that you are so de...Dude, are you proud of the fact that you are so deplorable to someone (who doen't know you personally, and is only judging you by what you say) that he refuses to even waste his time debating you? <BR/><BR/>Don't you realise that by bringing up other conflicts and the abuse of figures there you implicitly concede Pollard's main point?<BR/><BR/>O dear.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-1130366918897186382005-10-26T23:48:00.000+01:002005-10-26T23:48:00.000+01:00How did you count the bodies at Srebrenica Neil?How did you count the bodies at Srebrenica Neil?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com