tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post846510824936137163..comments2023-11-05T22:35:31.766+00:00Comments on Neil Clark: Jonathan Woss is a RankerNeil Clarkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10479041156190090119noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-90474477912205495052007-12-09T22:01:00.000+00:002007-12-09T22:01:00.000+00:00Sowwy,What I meant to say was that I am worth 1,00...Sowwy,<BR/><BR/>What I meant to say was that I am worth 1,000 Neil Clarks.<BR/><BR/>Jonathan Woss,<BR/><BR/>London NW3Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-73923145603565434832007-12-08T01:17:00.000+00:002007-12-08T01:17:00.000+00:00Old news, Neil. Back in February I was ranting abo...Old news, Neil. Back in February I was ranting about the ol' dinosuar that is the BBC and the outrageous pay it gives it's 'talent'. <BR/><BR/>http://editorialbear.blogspot.com/2007/02/bbc-staff-to-strike-over-pay-friday.html<BR/><BR/>It's only since becoming an EXPAT that I've begun to appreciate the BBC. And I don't pay the licence fee any more!!Roland Hulmehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08979437320446956987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-74766811127969882682007-12-07T22:06:00.000+00:002007-12-07T22:06:00.000+00:00You haven't tried for a job as a journo with the B...You haven't tried for a job as a journo with the Beeb have you eh, Neil my old mate? And failed to get in? They are all NeoCon Warmongers there . . . you have no chance pal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-78014369684553283042007-12-07T21:41:00.000+00:002007-12-07T21:41:00.000+00:00I'm not saying that Ross isn't worthy of work at t...I'm not saying that Ross isn't worthy of work at the BBC, only that he shouldn't be paid a salary so massive( £6m a year0 that it means lots of other BBC journalists have to lose their jobs. Ross's transfer earnings are way too high. Let's get back to how it was in the 1970s. Then the biggest stars of the day like of Eric and Ernie, Mike Y and the Two Ronnies did have higher salaries than others at the Beeb, but the difference wasn't that massive compared to today. I'm sure Ross would do his job for £60,000. If he doesn't and wants to go elsewhere, the BBC should let him. While he can be funny, he's not irreplacable.Neil Clarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10479041156190090119noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17766817.post-11416319405827129012007-12-07T21:33:00.000+00:002007-12-07T21:33:00.000+00:00Clever title, took me a while to work it out, but ...Clever title, took me a while to work it out, but then i got it! Speach impediments are funny!<BR/><BR/>Now thats the usual objection to juvenile titles out the way a relatively faultless article, though I would suggest that whilst not worth tens of millions Ross is certainly worthy of work at the BBC, being, in the opinions of many, a very funny man. <BR/><BR/>And a question many people about BBC journalism have asked is 'should they send 3 teams to cover one event and come to the same conclusions?' The answer is probably not, its inefficient. Having said that, the money saved should be reinvested in the BBC's current affairs work. Or more Dr Who. <BR/><BR/>PeteAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com